When I read it as a child I most certainly didn’t think the tree’s situation was ideal or even something I wanted. If anything, it taught me that allowing yourself to be used by someone who is ungrateful and selfish leaves you with nothing and that no matter what you give or how much of yourself you sacrifice you’ll still end up with nothing in return.
I didn’t think it depicted love, either. The boy certainly didn’t give the tree love in return for everything she had given him.
I saw it as a cautionary tale. The message I took away from it was that if you allow yourself to give all of who you are to people who do not care about you, you will not receive love or even gratefulness. In the end they will just sit on you and continue to use you until you have nothing left for them to use or take.
That was my interpretation of it as well. I think that may have turned me off even more to the protagonist. The idea...
describes parenthood.
I also was horrified at the book, for basically the same reasons. But my experience has been that most people thought it...
What’s interesting is that Rabble and I are sort of reading the book the same way, but responding to it differently....